School to Prison Pipeline

School-to-Prison

Pipeline

PoLICIES AND PRACTICES ThAT fAVoR INCARCERATIoN oVER EDuCATIoN Do uS ALL A gRAVE INJuSTICE.

BY marilyn elias ILLuSTRATION BY chris buzelli

IN MERIDIAN, MISS., POLICE ROUTINELY ARREST

and transport youths to a juvenile deten- tion center for minor classroom misbehav- iors. In Jefferson Parish, La., according to a U.S. Department of Justice complaint, school officials have given armed police “unfettered authority to stop, frisk, detain, question, search and arrest schoolchildren on and off school grounds.” In Birmingham, Ala., police officers are permanently stationed in nearly every high school.

In fact, hundreds of school districts across the country employ discipline policies that push students out of the classroom and into the criminal justice system at alarming rates—a phenomenon known as the school- to-prison pipeline.

Last month, Sen. Richard Durbin, D -Ill., held the first federal hearing on the school- to-prison pipeline—an important step toward ending policies that favor incarceration over education and disproportionately push minority students and students with disabil- ities out of schools and into jails.

In opening the hearing, Durbin told the subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee, “For many young people, our schools are increasingly a gateway to the crim- inal justice system. This phenomenon is a con- sequence of a culture of zero tolerance that is widespread in our schools and is depriving many children of their fundamental right to an education.”

A wide array of organizations—includ- ing the Southern Poverty Law Center, the

NAACP and Dignity in Schools—offered testimony during the hearing. They joined representatives from the Departments of Education and Justice to shine a national spotlight on a situation viewed far too often as a local responsibility.

“We have a national problem that deserves federal action,” Matthew Cregor, an attor- ney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, explained. “With suspension a top predictor of dropout, we must confront this practice if we are ever to end the ‘dropout crisis’ or the so-called achievement gap.”

In the words of Vermont’s Sen. Patrick Leahy, “As a nation, we can do better.”

what is the School-to-Prison Pipeline?

Policies that encourage police presence at schools, harsh tactics including physical restraint, and automatic punishments that result in suspensions and out-of-class time are huge contributors to the pipeline, but the problem is more complex than that.

The school-to-prison pipeline starts (or is best avoided) in the classroom. When com- bined with zero-tolerance policies, a teacher’s decision to refer students for punishment can mean they are pushed out of the classroom— and much more likely to be introduced into the criminal justice system.

who’s in the Pipeline?

Students from two groups—racial minorities and children with disabilities—are dispropor- tionately represented in the school-to-prison

Spring 2013 39

The odds

Students Suspended During the 2009-2010 School Year

Black students (1 in 6)
American indian students (1 in 13) Latino students (1 in 14)
White students (1 in 20)

Asian students (1 in 50)

Avoiding the Pipeline

how can school districts divert the school-to-prison pipeline?

1. increase the use of positive behavior interventions and supports.

2. Compile annual reports on the total number of disci- plinary actions that push students out of the classroom based on gender, race and ability.

3. Create agree- ments with police departments and court systems to limit arrests at school and the use of restraints, such as mace and handcuffs.

4. provide sim-
ple explanations of infractions and pre- scribed responses in the student code of conduct to ensure fairness.

5. Create appropri- ate limits on the use of law enforcement in public schools.

6. Train teachers on the use of positive behavior supports for at-risk students.

pipeline. African-American students, for instance, are 3.5 times more likely than their white classmates to be suspended or expelled, according to a nationwide study by the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights. Black children constitute 18 percent of students, but they account 46 percent of those suspended more than once.

For students with disabilities, the num- bers are equally troubling. One report found that while 8.6 percent of public school chil- dren have been identified as having disabili- ties that affect their ability to learn, these stu- dents make up 32 percent of youth in juvenile detention centers.

The racial disparities are even starker for students with disabilities. About 1 in 4 black children with disabilities were suspended at least once, versus 1 in 11 white students, according to an analysis of the government report by Daniel J. Losen, director of the Center for Civil Rights Remedies of the Civil Rights Project at UCLA.

A landmark study published last year tracked nearly 1 million Texas students for at least six years. The study controlled for more than 80 variables, such as socioeco- nomic class, to see how they affected the like- lihood of school discipline. The study found that African Americans were disproportion- ately punished compared with otherwise sim- ilar white and Latino students. Children with emotional disabilities also were dispropor- tionately suspended and expelled.

In other studies, Losen found racial differ- ences in suspension rates have widened since the early 1970s and that suspension is being used more frequently as a disciplinary tool. But he said his recent study and other research show that removing children from school does not improve their behavior. Instead, it greatly increases the likelihood that they’ll drop out and wind up behind bars.

Punishing Policies

The SPLC advocates for changes to end the school-to-prison pipeline and has filed lawsuits or civil rights complaints against districts with punitive discipline prac- tices that are discriminatory in impact.

According to the U.S. Department of

Justice, the number of school resource offi- cers rose 38 percent between 1997 and 2007. Jerri katzerman, SPLC deputy legal direc- tor, said this surge in police on campus has helped to criminalize many students and fill the pipeline.

One 2005 study found that children are far more likely to be arrested at school than they were a generation ago. The vast major- ity of these arrests are for nonviolent offenses. In most cases, the students are simply being disruptive. And a recent U.S. Department of Education study found that more than 70 per- cent of students arrested in school-related incidents or referred to law enforcement are black or Hispanic. Zero-tolerance policies, which set one-size-fits-all punishments for a variety of behaviors, have fed these trends.

Best Practices

Instead of pushing children out, katzerman said, “Teachers need a lot more support and training for effective discipline, and schools need to use best practices for behavior mod- ification to keep these kids in school where they belong.”

keeping at-risk kids in class can be a tough order for educators under pressure to meet accountability measures, but classroom teachers are in a unique position to divert stu- dents from the school-to-prison pipeline.

Teachers know their students better than any resource officer or administrator—which puts them in a singularly empowered posi- tion to keep students in the classroom. It’s not easy, but when teachers take a more respon- sive and less punitive approach in the class- room, students are more likely to complete their education.

The information on the following pages highlights common scenarios that push young people into the school-to-prison pipeline and offers practical advice for how teachers can dismantle the school-to-prison pipeline.

Toolkit

Want to deepen your understanding of the

school-to-prison pipeline?
visit>>
tolerance.org/school-to-prison-pipeline

40 TEACHing TolErAnCE